Williams Boss James Vowles has mentioned that the Grove team is still disadvantaged due to certain tools they use for designing and developing their vehicles. This is one of the factors contributing to his belief that the present FW47 model is challenging to operate.

Vowles' time with the team has been characterized by the rebuilding efforts he has led through investments made away from public view. One well-known instance of this shift was moving away from using a central Excel spreadsheet for tracking the vehicle's assembly. .

Continued investments in newer tools and equipment have been made; Williams was a strong supporter of implementing a graduated capital spending cap. This would help ensure that the less well-funded teams in F1 could allocate more resources towards aligning their infrastructure with those at the forefront.

Sport.bangjo.co.id notes that Williams doesn’t anticipate the complete effects of the new infrastructure will be felt until they start building their 2028 vehicle. However, advancements continue to increase as the squad gets more familiar with the updated internal processes.

Vowles stated during a selective media briefing, which included Sport.bangjo.co.id, "I believe there are certain features of the vehicle that haven’t reached the appropriate standard yet."

I believe the equilibrium we aim for isn’t quite right when it comes to our drivers, and currently, we’re somewhat restricted with the tools we’re utilizing.

I believe there are certain aspects we can align this year, yet part of it might require us to adopt a distinct approach moving forward.

James Vowles, Williams

Image courtesy of: Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images

Vowles provided an update on the enhancements happening at Williams, encompassing both infrastructure upgrades and cultural shifts within the team to foster a more cooperative approach in developing the vehicle.

He mentions that the management systems he has put into place needed an extensive period of adjustment, especially since pre-packaged solutions do not cater specifically to F1 requirements.

However, he believes that adjusting those systems to achieve a specific lap time improvement is motivating the Williams team members to enhance their performance.

Vowles mentioned that this seems like the natural progression along the anticipated development pathway, achieved simply by addressing certain basic elements.

Actually, the key to this lies simply in facilitating conversations among individuals along with some basic structure that enables everyone to collaborate more effectively.

"What I'm pleased by is that this direction of travel should continue on with a little bit more plus-plus into 2026.

Carlos Sainz, Williams

Photo by: Zak Mauger / Motorsport Images

It’s challenging for both us and the fans to grasp why we’re making these changes, but our goals revolve around enhancing infrastructure, technology, internal systems, key performance indicators, and measuring aspects like the time required to construct a front wing, the cost associated with building one, and the extent of our work done either internally or externally. Additionally, we focus on evaluating the duration needed for designing processes, the number of iterations performed, and the quantity of wind tunnel hours necessary to achieve an additional increment of performance.

These are all the key performance indicators that lead you to become champion-level material. The outcomes on the racetrack are simply a result of this process, which is why I’m concentrating on these metrics rather than directly focusing on race results. As was seen in ‘25, and I believe will continue into ‘26, progress will be steady.

This approach relies on data-driven decisions; continuously altering these parameters will result in producing an increasingly quicker vehicle each year until ultimately surpassing your rivals.

The cultural shift is incredibly significant since you have to collaborate with an entirely different group of individuals, which can bring organizations to a halt. This isn’t to say that the change was merely substantial; it would be equally impactful for any organization globally.

But here’s how you extract the milliseconds from this data. Consider your Key Performance Indicators: How many milliseconds each week do we generate in terms of aerodynamics, vehicle dynamics, or via simulations?

They are the same factors that push you ahead. The only difference is that instead of aiming for 10 milliseconds per week, you aim for 15 milliseconds to become championship caliber.

Once you have the appropriate data enveloped with suitable tools and effective communication, you can significantly enhance things without becoming overly casual about it, within reasonable limits.

Read Also: Vowles: Securing "incredible" Verstappen would come with downsides for Mercedes