New Delhi [India], March 26 (ANI): Shortly after advocating for the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act and mentioning that "circumstances would be different" if the law regarding judicial appointments hadn’t been invalidated by the Supreme Court, Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar met floor leaders of various political parties.

Following the accusations against Justice Yashwant Varma, a meeting was convened after a blaze at his home on March 14 revealed a significant quantity of cash Justice Varma has strongly refuted the accusations, stating emphatically that both he and his family do not possess the mentioned assets. cash .

Earlier that day, the Vice President mentioned the accusations related to Justice Yashwant Varma, stating that this issue has been troubling the thoughts of everyone across different levels of government administration.

"In consideration of maintaining dignity and exhibiting respectful behavior, this House collectively established a legal framework in 2015. The constitutional framework that emerged with unanimous consent except for one abstention from Parliament, and subsequently approved by various state legislatures, ought to serve as the guiding principle since it received validation through the President’s endorsement via signature under Article 111," he stated.

"This is an appropriate moment for everyone to reaffirm that it was a visionary move approved by Parliament. Consider how different things would be if this had occurred," he further stated.

Dhankar stated that the historic progress achieved in the Indian Parliament, marked by an unusual alignment of unity since independence, was endorsed by the requisite state legislatures.

"We must consider what transpired regarding this matter. According to the Constitution, there is no clause permitting any alterations to it. The constitution does not include any provisions for reviewing or appealing a constitutional amendment. However, should there be laws enacted by the national parliament or regional states, judicial scrutiny can occur...to ensure compliance with constitutional stipulations," he stated.

"At this moment, the country faces two scenarios: first, the outcome of actions taken by the Indian Parliament, ratified by state legislative bodies and formally approved by the President through signature as per Article 111; and second, a directive issued by the judiciary. We now find ourselves at a critical juncture. I earnestly encourage all members to contemplate these points," he further stated.

He stated that no institution should violate what was established by the parliament and supported by the legislatures.

“And this point should once more, let me emphasize, serve as the guiding principle in our approach. Given what we have witnessed with such excruciating pain…… We hold innocence in the highest regard until guilt has been established,” he stated.

The Chairman likewise mentioned his encounters with Opposition Leader Mallikarjun Kharge and House Leader JP Nadda.

"We will revisit this matter concerning the House due to its significant importance, which extends far beyond just legal complications. This issue pertains to the sovereignty and supremacy of Parliament itself and questions our relevance altogether. Should we amend the Constitution but find that such amendments cannot be implemented, I am confident that Parliament possesses the authority needed for these changes. Regardless of where power resides within any organization, ensuring that decisions made by the Indian Parliament, endorsed by a required number of state legislatures, remain valid," he stated.

Yesterday, I benefited greatly from the insightful and seasoned advice of both the Leader of the House and the Leader of the Opposition. They graciously accepted my invitation to engage in discussions about this crucial matter affecting every aspect of our governmental operations. This topic is indeed quite significant. Together, we acknowledged recent events and recognized the positive step where, for the first time ever, the Chief Justice of India chose to disclose all information publicly. However, following suggestions made by the Leader of the Opposition—with agreement from the Leader of the House—it was decided that the issue should be further examined upon my request. floor leaders ," he added.

Dhankar stated that the legislature and judiciary function most effectively when they operate efficiently within their specific domains with swiftness.

"I prefer not to make judgments on any matter, yet one aspect widely embraced across the nation is that all materials presented before the Supreme Court have been made accessible to the general public. Furthermore, the swift establishment of a committee ensures that we can expect information to become available soon," he stated. Rajya Sabha Chairman said. (ANI)