Electric vehicles can serve as the accessible and dependable means of transport we require. However, this is true only if we cease attempting to confine them within the frameworks designed for gasoline cars.
China’s leadership in the electric vehicle (EV) market can be attributed to various widely discussed factors. The Chinese government invested heavily in this sector, streamlined regulations, offered incentives to consumers, and made land more affordable. Local firms without much background in manufacturing internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles viewed this shift as a chance rather than a burden, unlike numerous Western enterprises which see it predominantly as a challenge. However, there is one aspect that receives less attention despite its significance.
A A much greater percentage of Chinese individuals purchasing electric vehicles are doing so for their first car. Many people previously owned just one or two vehicles. This is crucial because in China, electric vehicles came without most of the burdens that continue to hinder their adoption here.

Ford’s CEO has recently stated that the economics of large electric SUVs are unresolvable. I concur with this view, so I believe that extended-range vehicles and hybrid models will persist in these market segments for quite some time.
In 2022, the typical purchaser of a new car in the United States was approximately 51 years old. per Cox Automotive Even typical buyers of used cars were around 49 years old, with both demographics boasting incomes above average. This indicates they are comparatively affluent individuals who came of age in an era heavily influenced by automobiles. Growing up during times when gasoline-powered vehicles were predominant, as well as when air travel remained costly and uncommon, many recall family excursions taken exclusively in fuel-driven cars. Throughout adulthood, these individuals have primarily bought petrol-fueled vehicles and depended largely on them for transportation needs.
Currently, they are being informed that electric vehicles will soon supersede their current models. However, for larger, heavier automobiles that most purchasers are used to buying, embarking on lengthy trips necessitates a significant additional cost, an array of specialized planning and charging applications, as well as a more time-consuming and challenging driving process. These consumers are now advised to purchase from the same manufacturer that previously offered gasoline-powered cars—a brand known to them—an upgraded version of these familiar vehicle types at higher prices, typically accompanied by, on average, worse reliability .
So of course they're pissed off.
I know I am. When looking to substitute a $2,500 Chevy Tahoe for camping trips, I opted to lease a Chevy Blazer EV instead. I enjoy cruising around town with it, but the ecological tires restrict its ability to handle unpaved terrain. The seats cannot be folded completely flat, which means I am unable to use it for sleeping during camping trips like I do with my Tahoe. During a 1,000-mile round trip to Utah, I spent many hours trying to charge it. .
I couldn't go ahead with seeing the amazing view at Bryce Canyon due to range anxiety and having just one out of the two required Tesla charging adaptors. The adapter I possessed was insufficient. permitted me to utilize Superchargers , but this meant I had to park my vehicle using two spaces, making me appear quite rude. What really added insult to injury was that with electricity rates between $0.53 and $0.65 per kWh at numerous charging stations, I ended up not saving anything compared to completing the journey in a gasoline-powered SUV.
The experience sucks.

I haven't come across a direct equivalent as an electric vehicle (EV) option for this since, honestly, the concept of someone who is 27 years old without children needing to drive such a large SUV that could practically serve as a sleeping quarters seems ridiculous. There isn’t really a place for an EV version of something like this.
If you’re coming at this from the perspective of a gasoline-powered vehicle, I understand completely. You might be thinking about long road trips. Imagine driving deep into remote areas. Consider summer vacations like traveling from Cleveland to Hilton Head, which takes 14 hours. Picture children crying at rest stops and all the inconvenience of adapting to a new method when your old gas car handled these issues years ago.
However, an electric vehicle is not like a gasoline-powered car; they have distinct differences. This implies a completely different set of compromises, as extensively discussed: The present models tend to be overly pricey or subpar for long-distance travel.

I enjoy driving my Blazer EV, yet I wouldn’t have shelled out the $52,000 asking price. Instead, I acquired it for $273 per month plus a down payment of $2,000, with both the dealership and GM absorbing some costs. This suggests that high-priced electric vehicles might not be attracting buyers based solely on their quality.
These two issues are interconnected. Once electric vehicles are freed from the requirement for long-distance travel, all other concerns become less significant.
Drive the Blazer instead. The experience I detailed extensively took place over three distinct days during an approximately eight-month period of owning the vehicle. These events occurred at the extreme end of unusual circumstances for me. One such instance was a 1,000-mile journey into rural America. This represents the quintessential vision of the classic American road trip that so many aspire to undertake. However, this kind of travel isn’t typical for how we primarily use our car. Having resided in California for around three years, I’ve embarked on journeys exceeding 500 miles just twice. Far more common are visits to places like Joshua Tree National Park and Anza Borrego Desert State Park, which fall comfortably within the capabilities of the Blazer’s range. Nonetheless, even those destinations can be considered somewhat outlying cases.
Even though most advertisements depict rugged mountain paths and emphasize features like towing capacity, speed, or exploring uncharted territories and mastering vast landscapes, these scenarios likely account for only about ten percent of your vehicle’s total mileage. In truth, it primarily transports you to work, school, social visits, or nearby towns. Its role is largely mundane as it moves you from point A to B without much grand adventure.

Listen, it would be awesome if this were our everyday reality. However, in trying to address extremely rare scenarios—such as people driving large luxury SUVs off-road—the Hummer EV became pricier, even more outlandish, and significantly heavier. Perhaps we could let hybrids and extended-range electric vehicles handle rock crawling instead.
In all these scenarios, an electric vehicle (EV) offers superior benefits. However, concentrating on long-distance travel has somewhat diminished this edge. Electric vehicles demand minimal routine upkeep due to their enclosed motors and less complex drive systems. But when you adapt an EV for extended journeys, it needs to be heavier, leading to higher tire costs. The straightforward design of EVs suggests they ought to cost less to manufacture as well. Nevertheless, predictably, the substantial battery drives up the price, making it $15,000 dearer than its gasoline counterpart.
Sure, I understand. You do. need To embark on that road trip. Although this occurs annually, it is crucial regardless of the reason. Believe me, I have no intention of seeking you out. Instead, my message is quite different: Allow gasoline to manage these tasks for now. Offer extended-range EVs , including hybrid systems and even traditional gasoline-powered drivetrains, for those who often embark on lengthy journeys. Gasoline trucks are remarkable vehicles, and it will be some time before any electric vehicle can match the Ford F-150’s capabilities at the same cost point. Let the internal combustion engines tackle cross-country drives; they have proven their mettle over the years.

The Lightning is an excellent pickup truck, yet it remains a hard sell compared to a gasoline-powered F-150 that offers lower costs and unmatched towing capabilities regardless of location.
This will allow electric vehicle designers to concentrate on the genuine benefits of this shift. Car manufacturers are opting to produce range-extender EVs equipped with smaller batteries and gasoline engines for extended mileage. Instead, they might also provide a higher-end all-electric option, boasting several hundred miles of battery range.
Reverse the approach. Provide the same compact battery option for both choices. Equip the electric vehicle with a 150-mile range and emphasize long-distance travel as an additional feature. Consider offering rental services for range extenders or extra battery units. Service centers at dealerships will likely seek fresh avenues to keep themselves occupied as electric vehicles rapidly surpass internal combustion engine reliability.
Provide us affordable electric vehicles that are genuinely appealing as well. Although buyers might not have favored the Nissan Leaf and Mini Cooper SE, did the planners contemplate that Americans would avoid hatchbacks irrespective of their power source? Consider offering a compact SUV with ample interior room and sufficient driving range to transport your mountain bike into the wilderness, all at an initial cost of $30,000 before incentives. If Chevrolet can provide a 319-mile Equinox EV for $35,000, then achieving even better value seems feasible.

The Chevy Bolt might suit anyone’s daily travel needs and also tackle mid-range journeys. Should someone succeed in giving it a more appealing design—something less bland than a laser printer—it could become the electric vehicle for the masses that we’ve been looking for.
Create a luxurious variant as well. I wouldn’t mind keeping my worn-out gasoline pickup indefinitely if my primary vehicle could be a premium electric pod featuring top-notch leather interiors, exceptional speakers, and the most comfortable seating I’ve experienced. Given that smaller motors and batteries would simplify the design, high-end finishes should become easier to incorporate. Also, produce an all-electric Ford Ranger; suggest going for the hybrid model only if long-distance travel is necessary. An electric vehicle offers a cost-effective, straightforward, and refined alternative rather than serving as a direct equivalent to something that’s almost perfect in its current form.

EVs are already gaining traction in the commercial van market, as purchasers in this category concentrate on their daily activities instead of an annual journey they might undertake.
This presents an occasion for reinvention. However, it necessitates moving away from viewing electric vehicles as superior or inferior to those powered by gasoline. Instead, we must consider them as a distinct mode of transport rather than just automobiles equipped with batteries. They won’t supplant petrol-powered engines across all scenarios—at least not currently. Yet, for our everyday existence and for approximately 90% of our regular driving distances, they represent the perfect answer.
EVs aren't gas cars. That's a good thing.
Contact the author: Mack.Hogan@insideevs.com .
Related Stories
- Why Level 1 Electric Vehicle Home Charging Might Be More Beneficial Than You Realize
- 2024 Chevy Blazer EV Owner Review After Half a Year: Pros and Cons
- The Issue With Taking Electric Cars on Long Journeys
- Will Hybrids Be the Cars of Tomorrow?
- Ford States Big Electric Trucks and SUVs Face 'Insolvable' Issues
- Creating a plug-in hybrid vehicle is much more challenging than you might imagine.
Our website uses cookies to improve your experience. Learn more